The 2013 Lions Tour – A Modern Cash Cow

169612200_10-4026851So the 2013 Lions Tour of Australia comes to an end, the Aussies got smashed, Warren was smiling and everyone got paid. The tour had it all, bright lights, topless men frolicking on beaches and the odd bit of rugby so why am I not entirely satisfied by the first series victory since 1997?

Let me lay my cards on the table, within the broader context of the game the Lions means little to me. I get it, I understand it but for me it serves no purpose. I watch the games and like to see Irish players do well. It’s the Ryder Cup of Rugby and rewards athletes who are recognised as elites in their domestic and national games and I am fine with that. A money making exercise with some very serious numbers behind it. According to the media reports the tour cost an estimated £14 million to run with the Australian rugby union benefiting from a £40 million windfall. Each home Union will pocket approximately £6 million so its clear to see the rationale behind the tour.

While I place more emphasis on the provincial and international competitions in general, I have always respected the ethos that underpinned the tour. Legends such as Willie John McBride and JJR Williams talk extensively of the tours of old, the struggle through adversity, the camaraderie etc. but when I look at the modern tours, particularly this one, I simply don’t see the correlation.

zz280513plane-08-4024894

Bombarded by topless shots, we did not see one picture of the squad visiting a hospital or engaged in any sort of CSR activity.

The rise of professionalism always meant that the Lions would evolve representing exciting opportunities. We all know the benefits of professionalism and it is to be encouraged however I think there is a very real risk of the values that make the jersey so revered are being lost in the bright lights. For me, the opening game against the Barbarians in Hong Kong was a glaring example of this. The game served no purpose and potentially put players at needless risk but it was a good occasion to the get sponsors in to the boxes and get their photos taken with the players. I am sure Adam Jones was thrilled. It served no purpose, except to generate approximately £10.4 million!

I am not bashing sponsors or being naive, I work in an industry where I understand the role of sponsorship and its value. The Lions is an attractive brand but its value lies in its heritage, a heritage that I feel is becoming distorted or even worse, lost as time goes on. In my opinion, the next tour in New Zealand will be telling. The approach taken to its coordination and communication will define our perceptions of the players and ultimately the jersey. The question for the powers that be, will be whether it is a case of evolution or revolution? Lion’s fans however can rest easy, with healthy numbers like those listed above there is no question marks over its future. To quote the great Puff Daddy, “it’s all about the Benjamin’s”.

Any comments, abuse etc. can be directed toward @dbkinch

Advertisements
This entry was posted in From the desk of David, Rugby. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The 2013 Lions Tour – A Modern Cash Cow

  1. @eoinredahan says:

    Great post, DBK. I was also left a little cold by the Lions series. While I was pleased they won, I only really cared how the Irish lads did. It turns out the ‘home’ nations don’t really like each other too much at all. Look at the over-the-top reaction to the dropping of O’Driscoll and the spiteful joy of those who backed Gatland’s team selection. With hand on Lionheart: How wholeheartedly will you ever cheer a team with 10 Welshmen or 10 Englishmen? Was there a single overjoyed Scot?

  2. Andrew Byrne says:

    Your comment about not seeing any pics of squad members visiting hospital wards is well made. Normally they do this sort of thing, perhaps they just didn’t want to promote it. If they didn’t visit sick kids, well they should have done.

  3. dkinch15 says:

    Thanks for the comments lads. I must confess to suffering post session depression when I penned the piece and was unsure if it was just me being a crank. It seems however that there are a few people who feel the same. I chatted to a few lads on Twitter yesterday and there were a multitude of on and off field issues that supporters took umbridge with. Sky Sports and its repetitive over the top coverage was highlighted consistently. Overall, I think what annoyed me most was the blatant prioritisation of money as the key driver. The money is very important however how can you honestly talk about a sacred band of brothers (blah blah) when it is clear that TV money and viewership plays a part in squad selection? Gatland would have been told to add Scots so as to ensure Scottish tourists travelling over and good tv viewership, not to mention online merchandise sales. In terms of the CSR, they would have had a tight schedule that sponsor and press commitments would have been prioritised. I am going to see if I can hunt down any info on Lions accounts online. By the way, the reaction to BOD was bordering on farce. We nearly made supreme tits of ourselves again, like with the Henry incident and canvassing FIFA.

  4. dkinch15 says:

    Just following from the last comment, see the link below which may be of interest. A colleague did some analysis of the reaction on social media to the decision to drop BOD. http://www.edelman.ie/index.php/2013/07/jaw-dropping-the-online-reaction-to-brian-odriscolls-omission/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s